That's reassuring, thanks Danielo Jon. On Monday, 6 April 2015 17:12:19 UTC+1, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:
> > > El domingo, 5 de abril de 2015, 13:41:37 (UTC+2), Jon escribió: >> >> Hi Danielo, >> >> I wouldn't have a use for the double encryption but the wiki I dragged >> the plugin to first happened to be already encrypted and then I got the >> error. >> As you'd referred to double encryption, I was just reporting back my >> findings. >> > > And I'm grateful for that. Sorry if I did not sound like that. > > >> >> By the way, before I start using it properly, can you give any assurances >> as to how robust it is? In other words is there any chance of it not >> working for some reason and the tiddlers won't open? >> > > If you are talking about Encryption robustness it is as robust as the TW5 > mechanism itself. Regarding reliability... it worked on all the scenarios I > tried, but maybe there could be some of them that I didn't think about. I > can't give you any guarantee but there is no rocket science involved so it > should be reliable. But before using it in any production/important > scenario, please try it out with some usage scenarios close to what you are > going to use with it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1e29c2f1-8749-446c-81a4-d1fb98961564%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
