Ciao Oleg & Jeremy Great thread. Love the detail. BOTH for its, well, details, but ALSO for instancing THE COMPLEXITY (aka richness). On Sunday, 5 March 2017 09:38:00 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > > Overall, I’d like to see TiddlyWiki better serve the needs of multiple > audiences: > > * commercial services for general users > * easy Node.js app deployment for advanced DIY users > * continued support for the standalone configuration in the browser for > most DIY users >
Jeremy, simple question: are these THREE routes so identifiable publicly clear yet? Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ff7fe300-abdc-4720-a235-de16a76c12d9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.