Ciao Oleg & Jeremy

Great thread. Love the detail. BOTH for its, well, details, but ALSO for 
instancing THE COMPLEXITY (aka richness).
 
On Sunday, 5 March 2017 09:38:00 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>
> Overall, I’d like to see TiddlyWiki better serve the needs of multiple 
> audiences:
>
> * commercial services for general users
> * easy Node.js app deployment for advanced DIY users
> * continued support for the standalone configuration in the browser for 
> most DIY users
>

Jeremy, simple question: are these THREE routes so identifiable publicly 
clear yet?

Best wishes
Josiah  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ff7fe300-abdc-4720-a235-de16a76c12d9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to