Going to static is less problematic because the result is no longer TW, but behaving children.
I DO agree that attention to the richness of "outgate settings" is of great merit. Josiah Lost Admin wrote: > > I can add even more complexity of use-case(s). > > A version that is editable and when saved generates a static html version > that the public uses. This one requires an actual http server and is more > of a content management system. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6479bc38-9710-40c4-8ee9-4b0c163f5baa%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
