Thanks Mark S. Yes 0000 to 3999 would work best. I can rename 4000 as 0000. Anything over 4000 would hit a void.
How should PMario's idea be modified for that? Best wishes Josiah On Friday, 14 July 2017 22:03:14 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > D'oh! Very clever Pmario! > > That will actually make a number between 0000 and 4999. Perhaps a number > between 0000 and 3999 would be acceptable? That's actually 4000 distinct > numbers. > > Mark > > On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 11:20:23 AM UTC-7, PMario wrote: >> >> imo better: >> >> \define number()$(n1)$$(n2)$$(n3)$$(n4)$ >> <$list filter="0 1 2 3 4 +[random[1]]" variable="n1" > >> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 +[random[1]]" variable="n2" > >> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 +[random[1]]" variable="n3" > >> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 +[random[1]]" variable="n4" > >> <<number>> >> </$list> >> </$list> >> </$list> >> </$list> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c75ffd34-eb02-4c10-9a52-696c8f038049%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
