Ciao Mark S. Many thanks. I'll test it out and get back to you...
Mark S. wrote: > > Another version of regexps to play with. This version will pull out all > matches at once when the global flag is used. So the filter could look like: > > "[<currentTiddler>get[text]regexps[(?g)#\w+\b]tolower[]]" > > Regular expressions in javascript can return sub-groups for non-global > expression searches. It might be possible to implement this in regexps, if > someone can think of a good use-case. > I definitely could use that. Let me go *look at what I'm currently working on and find a real use case*. Sub-groups allow a lot of things, like (1) moving bits of the matched string around; (2) discarding bits of it you don't need; (3) duplicating a sub-group, say as a heading. Plus. With what you have developed so far *is it possible to return a MATCH COUNT*? If that were possible I have definite use cases I can lay out. This is exciting. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/70e104d6-ae5e-4d60-b03f-43ff6fc6bffc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
