Hi Josiah and thank you, Could you please point me towards the work of Riz? I don't think I've seen it and it would be very useful to see what other people have done. The other work I found that was useful to me, in addition to Jeremy's docs, was by Welford: https://github.com/welford/twstaticblog
Indeed static sites are poorly named - the only thing that's static about them is the deliverable assets at any instant in time. In fact Tiddlywiki itself is usually delivered as a "static" asset but is, of course, very dynamic once on the client. The main win for me in setting up the system as I have is that I now have effectively "one click" publishing from TW on my desktop to the Netlify global CDN, so my site has the same up-time and availability as some major sites (https://www.netlify.com/case-studies/). All I have to do is tag tiddlers "Live" and run a Git commit and the site gets rebuilt "in the cloud" in about 30 seconds. One more reason to love Tiddlywiki. Regards, Richard On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 10:44:32 PM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao RichardWS > > I made a static site with Tiddlywiki and a tutorial explaining how I did >> it: https://www.didaxy.com/exporting-static-sites-from-tiddlywiki >> > > A few comments ... > > 1 - Far too modest. > Don't underwhelm your audience. > As far as I can see this is documentation of a fairly developed CMS > web-site PUBLISHING SYSTEM. > > 2 - Saying its "static" generation sorta separates the mother from baby. > But I don't think its accurate. Your method, even if you yourself don't go > that way, could ALSO generate dynamic sites (i.e. that include JavaScript). > > 3 - I think that more upfront, *probably in the Title, you should make > clear this is a NODE.JS mediated CMS*. [Its important in the sense that > on GG there is a lot of discussion about "static" TW. Frankly, most of it > is confusing truly STATIC sites with REDUCED ACCESS interface a lot of the > time. You want to avoid getting mixed into that confusion like the plague.] > > 4 - The DETAIL in your tutorial is great to read. > > 5 - A wondering? Is this compatible with what Riz did? If so, then a link > to his examples could be helpful adjunctive to display the potential in a > strongly visual way. > > Very best wishes > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fbaec9bc-2428-423c-8921-0f4f305b9e7f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
