Wow! That looks awesome! hopefully one-day you'll share that as well! Best, Diego
On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 1:35:02 PM UTC-6, Evan Balster wrote: > > Hello, Diego — > > You can find a few curiosities hidden in the formulas wiki > <https://evanbalster.com/tiddlywiki/formulas.html> if you search "demo". > > My impetus for building the formulas plugin was a "work journal" > application I wanted to build for archiving and visualizing my time usage > over a period of years (see the attached image). That application also > uses my condition and CSV unpacker plugins. > > On Monday, 8 January 2018 11:55:38 UTC-6, Diego Mesa wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> Just want to ping the community and see if anyone has had any cool uses >> they wouldn't mind sharing? >> >> Diego >> >> On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 7:31:27 PM UTC-6, TonyM wrote: >>> >>> Totaly Agree >>> >>> Let us state it upfront >>> >>> Formula uses wiki text references except in Filters where the modified >>> form also matches normal TiddlyWiki filter syntax. >>> >>> Regards >>> Tony >>> >>> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 14:56:08 UTC+11, Evan Balster wrote: >>>> >>>> Heheh, well, I'll reply anyway. >>>> >>>> The single vs. double format for variables and transclusions is another >>>> thing I've thought about for the plugin. Right now, formulas use the >>>> WikiText syntax (double brackets) for transcluded and variable values, and >>>> this helps with general consistency. Filter expressions inside formulas >>>> still use the single-bracket syntax, as they do everywhere else. >>>> >>>> I've considered allowing the shorter <single-bracket> style anywhere in >>>> formulas, and there isn't much stopping me on a technical level, but I >>>> worry that supporting two styles might create more confusion than it's >>>> worth. Better to stay similar to WikiText, in my mind... >>>> >>>> On Friday, 29 December 2017 21:46:46 UTC-6, TonyM wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Evan, >>>>> >>>>> I will heed your advice. >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good what you are working on. >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure if it is important to you but I was reading an >>>>> explanation for formats in filters where we use <variable> rather than >>>>> <<variable>> and {!!fieldname} was used in place of [{{!!fieldname}}] >>>>> because when not in wiki text the << >> and {{ }} is used to avoid >>>>> clashing with HTML. I would assume as a rule you will need to adopt one >>>>> or >>>>> the other rule for inside formulas and state it as such in documents. >>>>> >>>>> In your above suggestions you are already adopting the double >>>>> brackets, I expect you should stick with that and regular filters retain >>>>> their exceptional rules, but what happens when people use your legal >>>>> format >>>>> in filters or filters in your legal formats? >>>>> >>>>> Food for thought, no need to reply. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Tony >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/342eab72-f984-4744-8e24-a384ac239a61%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
