Ciao Riz My feeling is YES regarding sort orders in core, if viable backwards compatible.
IMO its currently a serious hassle in TW we lumbered with a counter-intuitive, cumbersome sort order. Best wishes Josiah Riz: I was very tempted to make a pull request to modify the current sort > filter instead of creating a plugin. I had a feeling that such a change > will not be backward compatible. > Riz wrote, fully: > > plugin and demo > <https://ibnishak.github.io/Tesseract/pluginsandmacros/index.html#Sortan%20-%20Sorting%20Alpha%20numerically> > > Currently available sort filters in the core either sorts alphabetically > or sorts numerically. It creates an issue when both alphabets and numbers > appear in the titles. > > For eg: Apple 8, Apple 9, Apple 10 will be sorted as > > Apple 10 > Apple 8 > Apple 9 > > With *sortan*, you can sort them as > > Apple 8 > Apple 9 > Apple 10 > > As usual, there is a *sortancs filter *too for case-sensitive option, and > both are negatable (ie, using them as !sortan will sort them in decreasing > order) > > > I was very tempted to make a pull request to modify the current sort > filter instead of creating a plugin. I had a feeling that such a change > will not be backward compatible. > > Anyhow, let me know what you feel, > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fad7b0cd-af81-454d-8b7c-b608d4886b4d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
