+1 I think that would be a good step. The issues arise in how to "metadata it" & whether it should go through "peer approval." My sense is that its "yet more work." I mean, WHO is gonna organise this?
One thing I thought about was posting links to such "special posts" to Twitter. I've largely held off because I don't feel (1) I have enough competence to judge what is best; (2) not enough hours in the day as one person to get it "rightly thorough". The upside would be that I could Tweet just those links from a TW and then publish that TW as a resource, properly tagged. I'd be perfectly happy to do that as a "holding area" for something that could then also get more seriously considered. But I could not reliably do the decision part of what to include alone. Best wishes Josiah Mark S. wrote: > > The complaint has been made frequently that good stuff posted in this > forum gets lost. <snip> > > How about we have a Bookmark section consisting primarily of a succinct > title, a brief description, and a link to interesting threads in this > forum? Ok, it could be to other discussions too, such as on reddit. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c2220a42-7dea-4cb7-b96b-bb3948e3836a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
