Josiah,
Small question big answer "In your pantheon schematic? Or generally? Where?"
- I currently Have a TiddlyWIki with a TWOutlier view of all the
solutions, tools and a lot more. Everything I have identified so far as
needing to be addressed in a comprehensive solution.
- We could call this a schematic model.
- I am working to turn this into a physically existing online resource.
I have structured the solution so that it allows scaling and growth buy
carefully dividing content into key areas.
- The key focus however is on an appropriate "publishing" of solutions,
so that they stand alone and can capture audiences in their own right, only
then bringing them to discover TiddlyWiki in all its glory.
Of late I realised a "Solution" can be as little as a thought bubble
through to a whole discipline. As a result a Solution may consist of few or
many things.
I have come to realise the value of each and every solution being able to
evolve in scale according to need. To put this in a practical way a
solution may be an item in a list, in a directory of solutions, It then may
have a page on a website with simple text, then it may have a social media
Conversation about it and other information. Eventually it may deserve its
own website or series of websites. As a result at this design phase I need
to ensure this possibility.
So since these solutions can be made up of any number of TiddlyWiki Objects
and some solutions will share these objects (examples at the top of this
thread). I want to understand and create repositories of each object type
that can be referenced in a given solution. Then once I start building
solution specific resources eg; "Presentations" I can record say relevant
plugins (and other objects) that can then be referenced in another
solution.
Basically I am trying to take the whole tiddlywiki kit and kaboodle
(universe) and reduce it to its systematic or schematic objects (analysis)
so that when I reassemble it (synthesis) there is little or no duplication
of everything, and there are multiple ways to find anything in the
tiddlywiki universe.
Finally one major driver of this approach is content capture and
maintenance along with community development and uptake. If we do not
structure this well it will be a nightmare to administer and use. I have
enough nightmares.
Send me your email address in a private message, if you wish to contribute
in more detail and I will invite you to a conversation about this, the
conversation tool is part of this solution.
I in fact, want you to contribute because you have being a key community
builder of late, raising examples and discussions.
Regards
Tony
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 10:08:42 AM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> TonyM wrote:
>
> ...I am not sure if Importers exist but Parsers and Exporters certainly
>> do, so I can use them.
>>
>
> Yes. We use them. And, obviously Importers too.
>
>>
>> Perhaps what you are saying belongs elsewhere in the pantheon of
>> TiddlyWiki?
>>
>
> In your pantheon schematic? Or generally? Where?
>
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/72171cab-dad4-43fd-bb96-a26047093d8b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
