Ciao PMario How could one disagree with that? Its true. But I'm not sure that is whole story.
Humans function never without affect (I mean, you are not an abacus) and gendered inflections of meaning are interesting and often in play. Though they are largely implicit in English--rather than explicit in the way they are in languages like Italian. So your idea is for all options?: Jack, Jackie and Jackie-Jack? Just thoughts Josiah PMario wrote: > > imo __it__ evolves over time and the content defines it. ... OR it is, > what _you_ want to make it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/55fefff6-6b9e-4247-ae00-16aa791f5d66%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
