Ciao TonyM & Mark S. Really interesting work.
A few small non-consequential notes on the regex ... This is just for interest. Marks' ... ^\w+?\.\w+?\.\w+?$ is perfectly serviceable. But it will work simpler too ... ^\w+\.\w+\.\w+$ ... The qualifying "?" that is to prevent "greedy" matches is not needed. A greedy match here is fine. One issue is that \w is shorthand for the JS character class ... [a-zA-Z0-9_] This means IF you used, for instance, any accented character it would break. A way round this would be to add the accented characters to an explicit class. But every one would need explicitly adding. Easier would be to use , instead of \w, a negative character class like [^\.] = its not a full-stop. The only problem with regex character classes in TW is they get a bit baroque to use as they need square brackets so you can't do them directly -- https://tiddlywiki.com/#regexp%20Operator Just thoughts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3e816e4c-0dcc-4b93-8ed9-1422a0326c59%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
