Thanks Tony. It looks good. But so far I wasn't able to get Timimi to work on OSX. It looks like it is installed, and I can press the "check" symbol to save, and it says "wiki saved", but the file itself is not saved.
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 3:49:28 PM UTC-7, TonyM wrote: > > Boaz, > > Timimi is Great, Even better than tiddlyfox because you do not need to > click on the cat. > > We have well and truly passed the "FireFox apocalypse" and it spawned > substantial innovation. The save and serve tiddlywiki solutions are > maturing and its slowly becoming easier to choose between options. I > recommend you look at TiddlyServer as once you set the settings.json you > can browse TiddlyWikis files and folder installs in the browser, and Bob > (Single Executable) for multi-access multi-user folder based wikis. > > Regards > Tony > > > > > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:22:23 AM UTC+11, Boaz Nash wrote: >> >> Thanks Josiah, I will see if I can install Timimi! >> >> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 8:11:07 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> This thread is a marker for what users need. It has had over FOUR >>> THOUSAND views! >>> >>> Mark S. gave good solutions. There are others. IMO timimi is good for >>> several platforms, including OSX, https://github.com/ibnishak/Timimi. >>> >>> It saves in the seamless way TiddlyFox did. >>> >>> Josiah >>> >>> On Monday, 5 November 2018 14:44:50 UTC+1, Boaz Nash wrote: >>>> >>>> Just found this thread and thought I'd try to get involved with >>>> TiddlyWiki again. This issue with TiddlyFox really killed me with >>>> TiddlyWiki. I still use Firefox as my default browser, so its annoying to >>>> have to switch to a different browser just for TW. Also, I have TW files >>>> all over the place, named due to their subject and in many different >>>> folders. So far, I have not been able to relocate these to a single >>>> location, and I don't really want to do that. I also have some simple >>>> HTML >>>> files that link to my TW files in their present locations. In order to >>>> move my TW files, I'd have to rewrite the links for all these HTML files. >>>> I invested heavily in the approach allowed by TiddlyFox, and now it >>>> doesn't work anymore. Its been almost a year, and I still try to use TW, >>>> but its not convenient. >>>> When I really want to edit my TiddlyWiki files, I use TiddlyDesktop, >>>> but it feels a lot less convenient than using it from FireFox. >>>> I will try to make another attempt to find a new approach. I guess it >>>> will involve throwing away a lot of files or some kind of major >>>> reorganization. >>>> Thanks for suggestions. I don't mean to just gripe. I got a lot of >>>> benefit out of TiddlyWiki. But for the last year it hasn't worked for me >>>> anymore. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 3:33:51 AM UTC-6, Norm Davis wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Firefox and Tiddly have long been great companions, but Firefox is >>>>> going sideways and the old Firefox Tiddly extension for saving in the new >>>>> Firefox 57 doesn't work. Will there be anyone working on a rewrite or a >>>>> new extension? Hope so! Thanks for any helpful info. >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/53d77828-d1f5-4923-a432-7c43e2779f64%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
