Josiah, I did not get your original message on security. I'm using Gmail, checked SPAM and TRASH and it was not in either. These are your messages, as of 11:35am this morning, that I had received:
[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki at the local Community College 6:38am [tw5] Re: I love TiddlyWiki because... 7:17am [tw5] Re: Favicon is not displayed 9:36am [tw5] Re: [I'd like to TALK] ... About Security 9:43am On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:43:04 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > For email users of this list ... I just wrote a post ... Could one of you > let me know if you got this message ... > > (Web users of the group can ignore this post) > > J. > > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> I'm getting very interested in TW as a potentially secure way to chat, >> and publish material that is ONLY for selected users/participants. >> >> Part of the background is that its becoming clearer that large online >> services are NOT, ultimately, able to secure conversation. I spent the last >> two days sorting out the aftermath for me of the Quora meltdown ... >> https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2018/12/04/quora-hacked-what-happened-what-data-was-stolen-and-what-do-100-million-users-need-to-do-next/ >> >> The problem is those types of system are owned and run at huge scale by >> far off companies and you don't know what they are doing. In fact THEY >> often don't know what they are doing till its too late. This just is the >> latest of a long line of serious cloud hacks. I basically don't trust them >> now. The hassle re-setting everything after an attack is both a PITA and >> very worrying. Identity theft can be a very complicated thing to sort out. >> >> TW seems interesting if you can add *two step verification*. >> >> Practically I'm very interested in being able to run a TW online just for >> conversation with ONE person ... i.e. One Wiki Per Converser. In this way >> we can chat AND in teaching I can show all but only what is needed. This is >> appropriate for how I work, which is all one-on-one. More collectivist >> security models interest me too, but the simple person-to-person is a >> specific interest. And I think it may be simpler to establish really >> robustly? >> >> This is just one set of thoughts. My main concern is: can TW be maximally >> secure? I think, if it could be demonstrably so on-line it could be a USP >> for it. >> >> Any comments welcomed ... >> >> These are just early thoughts >> Josiah >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4143b75d-c05a-4612-bc80-9ed46deede13%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
