There is Whole (off-topic) world in that subject. The main issue is stuff gets so very obscured. Protection at the price of deepening Obscurity? Something seems wrong!
On Monday, 18 February 2019 15:59:18 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > I find LE to be more logical too, but unfortunately this doesn't seem to > be the future for Android (or any platform, actually). Everything is about > security, and with each upgrade they've found some new way to tighten > things up. In the new paradigm, apps talk to apps only after getting > permission, and then only in a limited capacity. > > Thanks! > -- Mark > > On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 6:21:49 AM UTC-8, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Mark S. >> >> I reply in bits (from Andy 8-zero-zero). >> >> I notice that Local Explorer is now deprecated? >> >> Is this because future Android may dump it? >> >> Personally I find it more logical and sensible than the other method that >> is "picture" driven. >> >> Josiah >> >> Mark S. wrote: >>> >>> Probably quinoid-v0-0-6-190217a.apk deserves to be in it's own release, >>> but there's a lot that isn't settled yet. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/45876a0d-3d41-4343-905a-210e0e8f73d4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
