Regarding what do WE do with our tech. 1 - we interlink it better so that we form a community of connected equals
2 - we better optimize tools for optimal auto-recognition by The Machine I have to say that TW is one of the most amazingly evolved wikis in history that nobody sees. That is partly a consequence of its design. Perhaps unintented. J On Thursday, 1 August 2019 18:27:47 UTC+2, h0p3 wrote: > > I am very interested in this problem. Technology is a double-edged sword; > it is only ever a means. What ends do you prescribe? TW does something > valuable in this space. What should it be? Where ought we go? > > On Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 7:36:08 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> I'm old and worn out. >> >> In the early days of the emergence of the net there was a whole >> sub-culture exploring "qualitative" data. What happened was that Google and >> other "Net Machines" took that work and implemented it as "quantative". >> >> Google makes no differentiation now. Your qualitative it makes >> quantative, whatever it is. That is part of its brilliance. And its horror. >> >> The residual issue is that the "open edge" gets closed. But that is >> exactly what should not have happened. >> >> Few people now understand the impetus towards "text-bases" (TW can be >> thought of as a "text-base") which recorded "EXPERIENCE", rather than >> "data-bases", which recorded the STATS of DOINGS. >> >> IMO, this issue is still alive, but muted in the avalanch of SERVER >> SAYINGS which are actually very partial. But DRIVING too much. Smothering >> the still live issue. >> >> No technology is innocent now. >> >> Josiah >> In deep(ish) thought >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0cdedb86-14c3-4371-9ec4-d8cff6a8f5e2%40googlegroups.com.
