Perhaps my reasoning was wrong but my fix awas correct.
This works as expected
<style>
.parra {display: block}
</style>
<p class="parra">test</p>
test
test
<p class="parra">test</p>
On Saturday, September 28, 2019 at 12:43:58 PM UTC+10, coda coder wrote:
>
> Tony,
>
> A p-element is *already* styled display:block automatically. Constructing
> a style attribute or a class with display:block to be applied to a
> p-element is redundant (i.e. it does nothing).
>
> Using your reference site, check for P here:
> https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_default_values.asp
>
> On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 7:00:37 PM UTC-5, TonyM wrote:
>>
>> CdK
>>
>> Yes that is happening and this is what we would expect. If rather than
>> use period, I do this myself we get the expected result.
>>
>> <p>test</p>
>> test
>> test
>> <p>test</p>
>>
>> I assume your fix is only adding the paragraph tags?
>>
>> If I use the developer tools inspect I see this in the erroneous results
>> <p>
>> <p>test</p>
>> </p>
>> <p>test test .test</p>
>>
>> I think what is happening is a result of the Wiki text and html see here
>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#HTML%20in%20WikiText
>>
>> Block mode versus Inline mode
>>
>> To get the content of an HTML element to be parsed in block mode, the
>> opening tag must be followed by two linebreaks.
>>
>> Without the two linebreaks, the tag content will be parsed in inline mode
>> which means that block mode formatting such as wikitext tables, lists and
>> headings is not recognised.
>>
>> If you alter our test case as follows it behaves as expected.
>> .test
>> test
>> test
>>
>> .test
>>
>> Perhaps we need to force block mode
>>
>> This demonstrates what I mean
>> .test
>> test
>> test
>> .test
>> <hr>
>> <p style="display: block">test</p>
>> test
>> test
>> <p style="display: block">test</p>
>>
>> So in support of this and as an extension I suggested earlier we could
>> use a class
>>
>> <style>
>> .parra {display: block}
>> </style>
>>
>> <p class="parra">test</p>
>> test
>> test
>> <p class="parra">test</p>
>> Of course the style would be in a stylesheet.
>>
>> And the designer could change the way our "period" paragraphs are styled.
>>
>> Additional reference https://www.w3schools.com/css/css_inline-block.asp
>>
>> Regards
>> Tony
>>
>> On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 9:52:46 PM UTC+10, Cd.K wrote:
>>>
>>> TonyM
>>>
>>> I discovered the following error in the period rule:
>>>
>>> .test
>>> test
>>> test
>>> .test
>>>
>>>
>>> renders as
>>>
>>> test
>>>
>>> test test .test
>>>
>>>
>>> expected:
>>>
>>> test
>>>
>>>
>>> test test
>>>
>>>
>>> test
>>>
>>> Do you agree?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Cd.K
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:40:16 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote:
>>>>
>>>> CdK,
>>>>
>>>> I love the operation of the leading period on a 5.1.20
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bea61627-812f-40a4-8311-a97d9eb22c00%40googlegroups.com.
