2008/11/24 bricklemacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> <snip>
>> config.macros.myMacro = {
>> handler: function(place, macroName) {/* ... */},
>> School: createPrototypedFunction(
>> function(){
>> /* This will become the constructor */
>> },
>> {
>> method1: function(){/*..*/},
>> method2: function(){/*..*/},
>> }
>
> Thanks, I will have a play/investigate with the above suggestion just
> so understand it better. A follow up question, is it "cleaner" or
> "better" this way as opposed to using object references as in my
> original example (or should this be take to a Javascrpt forum)?
It depends on what you want to do, and what the requirements are.
Putting the prototype definition outside:
+: It doesn't require an extra function to work
-: It's not completely inline code
Using my helper function:
+: Completely inline code
-: Requires an extra function to work, the code might look confusing
for some people
In the end it's a matter of taste and judgement. I propose that my
function be added to TW. Unless there's already such a function. (I
sadly haven't fiddled with tiddly for a while now so I don't keep up
with news. I just lurk this list.)
/Ove
-----BEGIN 2ROT13 MESSAGE-----
Low Bitrate Netlabel: <http://flb.gg8.se/>
Blog:
<http://gameboygenius.8bitcollective.com/>
SKRIVA på Lysator. Ditt Ahrvid-fria alternativ:
<http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/korkek?SKRIVA?>
Sätt på ett par flipflops, vippa på rumpan
och gör det här till en minnesvärd sommar!
-----END 2ROT13 MESSAGE-----
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWikiDev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
