Agreed, we should tag releases - I think tagging was simply overlooked when we moved to GitHub. I'll try and retrospectively tag the 2.6.2 release. I'll also try and ensure all releases are tagged in future.
Martin On 15 July 2011 16:15, PMario <pmari...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 15, 12:49 pm, rakugo <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote: >> @fnd points out (on irc) that other projects tag and that it makes >> things clearer which is fair enough. >> So I take it back @pmario, we probably should do this :) > > As you pointed me to the Version.js file, I thought, it would be ok. > But than I realized, that 2.6.2 would be allready a problem, due to > the commit message. You have to dig into every possible source, to get > the real version number. > > So way to many clicks. > > Vote +1 for tags > > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
