Forgive a mere mortal, and if this is irrelevant then just disregard it but;
IMO defining multiple macros, or macros in a tiddler containing other stuff, is not true to tiddler philosophy. There mere fact that a macro is *defined *indicates that it should be an (individual) tiddler. Adhering to tiddler philosophy here would also open up for a *much* more friendly UI for creating macros, as I've noted elsewhere. Briefly; an (individual) macro tiddler could for example have the *type *macro and thus a specific macro edit template with separate fields for the macro title and another for parameters. Why should a user have to learn special syntax for macros when they are basically just encompassing "shells". In practice one currently typically needs to define multiple macros within the same tiddler. This could be easily solved, in accordance with what I just wrote, by adding new macros comparable to how we currently add new fields. In actuality, what is created are separate macro tiddlers but they are presented (transcluded) as if part of the current edit view. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/188e4f82-e542-4360-a95e-1085b840c1cd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
