I for one will have to rework 14 patches that I have to carry on our local libtiff in Google. From my point of view, it would be a huge benefit having the whole codebase reformatted for consistency. I see the current inconsistency in every commit to libtiff as I review all of the diffs for the library side of the code.
-kurt On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:41 AM Bob Friesenhahn < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, Even Rouault wrote: > > > > Hoping for no strong opposition and religious discussions about code > > formatting preferences, I'll merge this soon. > > I expect that there will be much anger from those hoping to produce > useful patches for older libtiff directly from libtiff source code. > > There will be initial pain but patches produced from that point > forward should be much cleaner. > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > Public Key, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt > _______________________________________________ > Tiff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff >
_______________________________________________ Tiff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
