> tiff2ps and tiff2pdf seem to be also good candidates for moving into archive 
> as they have a number of reported security related issues and a significant 
> code size. Their functionality is (at least mostly) covered by the convert 
> utility of ImageMagick.

We use tiff2pdf and tiff2ps intensively as part of the post-processing of 
digitized books, newspapers, and other documents. They are fast and effective, 
and do exactly what we need. Seeing them go would be a real loss.

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff

Reply via email to