Revision: 4810
          http://tigervnc.svn.sourceforge.net/tigervnc/?rev=4810&view=rev
Author:   ossman_
Date:     2011-11-20 15:37:31 +0000 (Sun, 20 Nov 2011)
Log Message:
-----------
The block size for the comparing update tracker was inefficently low. Raising
it from 16 to 64 pixels significantly reduces the CPU overhead in many cases,
without sacrificing much in what it detects.

Modified Paths:
--------------
    trunk/common/rfb/ComparingUpdateTracker.cxx

Modified: trunk/common/rfb/ComparingUpdateTracker.cxx
===================================================================
--- trunk/common/rfb/ComparingUpdateTracker.cxx 2011-11-20 15:36:11 UTC (rev 
4809)
+++ trunk/common/rfb/ComparingUpdateTracker.cxx 2011-11-20 15:37:31 UTC (rev 
4810)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 }
 
 
-#define BLOCK_SIZE 16
+#define BLOCK_SIZE 64
 
 bool ComparingUpdateTracker::compare()
 {

This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the 
world's largest Open Source development site.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-commits mailing list
Tigervnc-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-commits

Reply via email to