On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:52:04AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > Hi, the attached two patches (against tigervnc 1.0.0) are my first > > working version of this. > > > > I'm building against 1.7.3.901 under gentoo. So far I've only had the > > time to test Xvnc itself, but it seems to be ok so far... > > I found my port to 1.7 was simplified by first taking the patch from > the upstream svn to replace the XORG_16 style defines with the XORG > define so that the existing checks became "#if XORG >= 16" > > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/x-cons/XW_NV_tw-clone/open-src/xserver/xvnc/upstream-xorg-version.patch > is the copy I use in my builds.
Yes, this is the main reason why we started to use XORG <number> instead of XORG_<number>. The "X.Org 1.7" patch is really welcomed. I will look on it and merge it to the main repo. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel