Why reinvent the wheel? I don't see why it's our job to reproduce the functionality of SSH. Just use SSH.
Now, if you instead mean internal encryption of the RFB protocol stream, then didn't we get that as a result of the GNU TLS functionality that Adam added? On 5/25/10 4:19 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very interested in VNC implementations that implement an ssh-like > channel mechanism. What I'm looking for is ideally an open source VNC > implementation that supports ssh-style tcp port-forwarding over RFB. If > that doesn't exist, and I don't think it does, because I haven't been > able to google my way to it, I'd also be interested in looking at code > for file transfer over RFB. > > Would anyone else be interested in implementing a port-forwarding > mechanism over RFB? > > Thanks in advance, > > Thomas Sondergaard > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
