On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:09:17PM -0600, DRC wrote: > On 2/11/11 2:24 AM, Martin Koegler wrote: > > It should be possible (HAVE_GNUTLS not defined). In that case, > > VeNCrypt + Plain are still available. > > > Right you are. I built without GnuTLS, and Plain definitely does still > work. That makes me feel better about the feature, in general. > > I guess the two outstanding issues, then, are: > > -- Should we make VeNCrypt an implicit security type, rather than > explicit (I say yes.)
If you need a patch: http://e9925248.users.sourceforge.net/tigervnc/tigervnc_1.0.0.svn0-1.debian.tar.gz See debian/patches Patch 0002. It changes the security type defaults too - you probably want to skip this for the official version. Instead drop all occurences of VeNCrypt in the defaults. Regards, Martin Kögler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
