If you could prepare it, that would be great. On Mar 11, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:34:56AM -0600, DRC wrote: >> In the process of testing the vncserver patch, I noticed that the server >> will start up successfully even if an invalid -SecurityTypes argument is >> passed. For instance, specifying >> >> -SecurityTypes=vnc >> >> will cause Xvnc to start up, but no client will be able to connect, >> because no valid authentication type will exist. A savvy user would >> have to read the server log file to figure out what was happening. This >> is the sort of failure that will generate about 1000 of the same >> question on support forums. >> >> IMHO, Xvnc should fail if an invalid security type is given as an argument. > > Such behavior sounds fine for me. Are you going to prepare the patch? > Or should I create it myself? > > A > > -- > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
