We are considering patch r4841 as a simple bugfix, solving a previous
regression. If it causes additional problems, please let us know.
When it comes to the Java client, we are currently not using that one, so
I have no strong opinion.
Rgds,
Peter
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, DRC wrote:
I hadn't actually branched 1.2 yet, so trunk is still supposed to be
stable. I was waiting for a more reasonable explanation of 4841 from
Pierre before branching, as that patch appears destabilizing as well.
On 2/2/12 11:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Revision: 4842
http://tigervnc.svn.sourceforge.net/tigervnc/?rev=4842&view=rev
Author: bphinz
Date: 2012-02-03 05:38:23 +0000 (Fri, 03 Feb 2012)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
---
Peter Åstrand ThinLinc Chief Developer
Cendio AB http://www.cendio.com
Wallenbergs gata 4
583 30 Linköping Phone: +46-13-21 46 00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
