On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:39:10 -0400 Brian Hinz <bph...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > OK, I was partially mistaken - icon support seems to work fine when I build > on Fedora 16 using the in-tree FLTK, but as far as I can tell, not on > RHEL5. Strace does show that viewer is opening the icon files from the > correct location (with the icon path patch), but the icon that is displayed > is just a generic icon rather than the tigervnc.png. The icons themselves > look fine (caveat that I have to use inkscape on RHEL5 rather than > convert). Are you building on EL5, and if so is icon support working as > expected? Maybe I'm missing a dependency of some sort? > The only dependency I can think of is if FLTK was built without PNG support. > If you've got a few minutes to look at it, I've placed some > RPMS/SRPMS/SPECS in an external svn repo: > > https://bphinz.svn.cvsdude.com/TigerVNC/branches/dist/epel5/ > > I have an f16 branch one level above epel5 as well. > Password protected. :) Rgds -- Pierre Ossman Software Development Cendio AB http://cendio.com Teknikringen 8 http://twitter.com/ThinLinc 583 30 Linköping http://facebook.com/ThinLinc Phone: +46-13-214600 http://plus.google.com/112509906846170010689 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
