On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:43:15AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:03:02 +0100,
> Adam Tkac wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Pierre just poked me about merging VeNCrypt specification into the RFB 
> > proto. I'm happy with the latest version, Dan, could you please tell us 
> > if it is fine from your point of view? Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > Regards, Adam
> 
> This thing has lingered for way too long. Better we commit this version
> and do improvements later than have nothing at all.

Its so long ago that I don't recall what version we're talking about.
Might as well commit it and fix any problems afterwards than letting
it linger.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list
tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto

Reply via email to