On 10/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...but keith's proposal is definitely worthwhile: it's very easy to add > > new features without ensuring that existing ones work. perhaps 0.2 > > tasks could be created along the lines suggested...?... > > Sure, I didn't mean to dismiss Keith's proposal! Sorry if that's how I > came across.
FWIW i didn't think you came across that way :-) > I think adding more and more precise test cases is key in avoiding > regressions and making sure thinks continue to work as expected. And > if things have to change, the diffs in the test cases show exactly > what happened. +1 JIRA does tasks and versions well and it's worth taking advantage of it. IMHO 0.2 is a reasonable target for perfection or rejection of features introduced in 0.1. - robert
