On 10/18/07, Chris Mattmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...In the future though, I think it should be discouraged to allow such > timelines to be a driver for committing patches....
Totally agreed, the driver must be the community's agreed upon vision of where Tika is going. In case of doubt, a poll, vote, or lazy consensus helps us decide whether to commit something or not. Yet we want to be agile and responsive, so occasional mistakes are unavoidable, and with respectful dialog (as is happening all over the Tika place now, that's great) things usually settle quickly. -Bertrand
