Jukka -
> I would rather see InputStream as the primary source
> of byte streams to be processed.
I understand. That's what I meant by "where our API requires an
*identifier*". I meant "identifier" in the precise sense ("textual tokens
(also called symbols) which name language entities", as per wikipedia), but
I can see that that could be easily misinterpreted if it is used more
casually.
I only mention this because there may be other times when I really do forget
something you already said, and don't want to use up my goodwill. ;)
Regards,
Keith
Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/22/07, Keith R. Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to suggest that where our API requires an identifier for a
>> resource, we provide access for it as a URL, and only where necessary, as
>> a
>> File, String, etc.
>
> I would rather see InputStream as the primary source of byte streams
> to be processed.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/URLs-as-Primary-Resource-Identifiers-tf4673177.html#a13366344
Sent from the Apache Tika - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
