Hi, On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Stephane Bastian <[email protected]> wrote: > In any case, as you pointed out Tika might not be the best place to do this. > However going back to my initial short term issue, which is extending the > Html Parser, I would definitely take the solution you proposed earlier if > it's still on the table ;)
I thought about this a bit more (see TIKA-182), and I must say that I'd rather not apply the patch to Tika. Doing so would create an extra binding between client code and the underlying parser library, and would make it difficult for us to later replace the parser if we wanted to. BR, Jukka Zitting
