I have since compared UT+ raw data with TAC32 display as follows: UT+ raw data TAC32 display
12/31/05 23:59:59 same 12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:00 12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:01 1/1/2006 00:00:00 1/1/06 00:00:01 1/1/2006 00:00:01 same I assume the UT+ raw data is correct UTC. During the 23:59:60 UTC second TAC32 gave two displays. The TAC32 apears to have 'stumbled' for a couple of seconds. The UT+ performed correctly. I obtained my data using a Nikon D70 digital still camera operated in 'burst' mode taking about three frames per second of the computer screen. Both the TAC32 display and UT+ raw data are shown together on the screen. If any one is interested I can send the data. I have 19 images. Each image is about 3MB. On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:05:14 -0600, Brian Kirby wrote: >I was using a M12+ with TAC32+ - what I observed is it displayed >00:00:01 twice ! - it never indicated 23:59:60. > >Bill Beam wrote: > >>TAC32 failed to display 23:59:60. >> >>Within a few seconds (possibly/probably one second) >>the TAC32 time display was correct. >> >>The raw data stream from Motorola UT+ correctly >>showed 23:59:60 as the last second of 2005. >> >>TAC32 queries the UT+ for UTC-GPS offset at 20sec >>after each minute and at 00:00:22 'UTC=GPS+14 seconds' >>was correctly displayed. >> >>I have lots of uninteresting photos of TAC32 display... >>and one interesting photo of the raw data stream from >>the UT+. If anyone cares to post it I can send a photo. >> Bill Beam NL7F [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: 12/29/2005 _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts