Yes, I should have put up a link with my other message: http://www.febo.com/time-freq/fmt. In addition to info about my measurement technique and my results from each year's test, there's a link at the bottom of the page to some pictures from the 2003 test. We have some newer ones but I haven't gotten around to posting them yet.
You might also be interested in the 2005 analysis page (linked from the URL above) -- some statistical analysis indicates that W1AW was actually about 0.4 Hz off in the frequency they reported on 160M. John ---- Doug Millar wrote: > > > Hi John, > Very interesting. Do you have any pictures of previous > years, etc.? It would be nice to see. > Doug > > > > At 05:48 AM 10/18/2006, you wrote: >> Henry Knoepfle wrote: >>> The November QST has an announcement for the "2006 Frequency >> Measuring Test" >>> ( www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt - though the 2006 announcement has not made it to >>> the website yet). The object is to determine as accurately as possible the >>> carrier frequency of a signal sent from W1AW on the 160m, 80m and 40m >>> bands. There will also be a signal sent from the west coast on the 40m >>> band. A lot of time nuts are hams. Who plans on participating? >> I'll be hosting our annual multi-multi (several operators with several >> different measurement techniques) FMT party in my basement again this year. >> >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list >> time-nuts@febo.com >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list > time-nuts@febo.com > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts