In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ulrich Bangert" writes: >Hi Poul-Henning, > >We are well aware of these facts! But if THAT were the reason to correct >for with different thumbwheel settings would not EVERY rubidium standard >in the world desperately need this kind of correction feature?
Yes, and they do. >Both my FRK-L and my LPRO need only C-field correction to get the >nominal 10.0000000 MHz out of it. They are factory adjusted. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
