Very interesting - the measurements I submitted were: 160: 1854317.63 80: 3857117.47 40: 7038806.11
40 (west coast): 7028351.61 I too got a >1hz high error on W1AW on 40. As I recall, the data had a double peak in it - think I picked the stronger peak which apparently was the wrong one. Apparently the propagation on 40 was interesting when the test was run. Cheers, Bill (kd5tfd) At 02:25 PM 12/28/2006, Connie Marshall wrote: >Here are the W1AW FMT Numbers I just received from Joe, NJ1Q (W1AW Station >Manager) >160m - 1854317.5 Hz >80m - 3587117.5 >40m - 7038804.9 Hz > >My copy of W1AW: >160M 1854317.77 Hz > 80M 3587117.95 Hz > 40M 7038806.03 Hz >I missed the 40m W1AW frequency by 1 Hz for some reason Hmmmmmm...... I will >go back and replay my audio file and see if I made a math mistake some >where. > >My copy of WA6ZTY >40M - 7028351.545 Hz > >Connie >K5CM >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
