Hi, Javier, I'm blocking much of the 80.x ranges, but that's one that I can safely punch holes in. What are the addresses for your servers?
Group folk: Please bear with us. We'll take it to E-mail as soon as we get the communication issues sorted. Thanks. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 19-Jan-07 at 09:01 Javier wrote: >Hi, Bruce... It was not about time/frequency standards, but about a >DSA602 :-). However... do you have also blocked the 80.0.0.0/8 range? >(because my two outgoing servers were blocked...). Both are from static >IPs and clean in SORBS :-). > >Sorry again to the group for the noise. > >Regards, > >Javier, EA1CRB > >Bruce Lane wrote: > >>Hi, Javier, >> >>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >>On 18-Jan-07 at 09:26 Javier wrote: >> >> >> >>>Off Topic - Sorry for the noise >>> >>>Hello, Bruce, >>> >>>I'm trying to send you an e-mail but get it bounced... Could you unblock >>>my address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! >>> >>> >> >> Uhhh... actually, it's not your specific address that's getting blocked, >but the entire 200.0.0.0/8 subnet. >> >> The reason is simple: I've seen nearly as much spam and network abuse >come from systems scattered all over that subnet as I have from China's >221/8. For that reason, I've chosen to refuse all traffic from 200/8 until >the ISPs realize that the Internet is not theirs to allow their spammers >to pollute. >> >> In other words: I can't easily punch a hole for you without opening our >network to further risk of spam and other abuse. >> >> Now, with that said: I think I know why you were trying to contact me >because I saw your post where you were looking for a time/frequency >standard. If that was it, I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in >selling this particular unit. First off, it has several frequency outputs >that are useful to me. Even if that were not the case, it has some pretty >amazing history behind it, in terms of having been involved in fields of >interest to me, so I would prefer to keep it around. >> >> Please continue your search, though. I'm sure you will find a decent >unit eventually. >> >> Happy hunting. >> >> >>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy, >>Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com >>kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m >>"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with >surreal ports?" >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>time-nuts mailing list >>time-nuts@febo.com >>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> >> >> >> > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy, Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m "If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?" _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts