From: James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [time-nuts] 15 ns vs. 15 nS Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:26:13 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Didier Juges wrote: > > Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. > > > > Didier KO4BB > > > > > A long s we are being pedantic: > 15 ns = 15 nanoseconds, but 15 nS = 15 nanosiemens. > > I am sure in the time-nuts list, we are concerned with nanoseconds, not > nanosiemens! We are concerned about nanosiemens too, as we are time-nuts, but in daily speak nanoseconds is the most probable prefixed unit we can expect. Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
