); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentlemen, I would like to pose a theory question and see if my thinking is faulty. My original design used a 50 MHz TIC clock and the TMR0 prescaler as the phase counter giving 20ns single sample resolution in the prototype system. A synchronizer is used to insure only whole clock pulses are counted. If a 1-second sawtooth correction having a 1ns sample resolution is divided by 20 with the low bits retained and added to the 20ns single sample phase count, does this result in a resolution of 1ns per sample when the corrected samples are averaged? Does a faster TIC clock with an external high-speed counter really result in better sample resolution as long as the TIC clock granularity is within the sawtooth correction limits with the TIC giving the the MSB's of the sample and the sawtooth correction providing the LSB's of the sample?
Just Wondering? Richard _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.