> The simpler and cheaper D > flipflop precedence detector used together with hardware sawtooth > correction has far higher resolution. It also has the advantage of not > requiring any high frequency clocks. > > Bruce
Since Rick & Dr TAC brought it up some months ago, does anyone have measurements for this approach yet? Also what is its equivalent resolution; i.e., what resolution would a conventional TIC need to be to match the behavior of the D-flipflop approach, all other factors equal? /tvb _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
