); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY In a message dated 11/7/2007 14:40:04 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Thanks. Here's my math. An average 10 MHz OCXO has an >EFC range of, say, 1e-7 over 10 V. That's 1e-8/V; 1e-11/mV. >Now look at the short-term frequency error of a Fury: >http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fury/log31837v.gif >( from http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fury/ ) >You see Fury frequency varies by at least 5e-11 over minutes, >as is normal for this class of OCXO. To make that much noise >with EFC effects alone you'd need on the order of 5000 uV >variation on EFC line. Another reason why I think the single >ground pin question is a non-issue. Hi Tom, thanks for sending the plots! I noticed the frequency stability on that plot was measured back in March. The unit should now be significantly more stable with the newer firmware than back in March. Did you have a chance to measure the frequency again with a firmware rev >1.01? From your ADEV plot at: _http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fury/log34965v.gif_ (http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fury/log34965v.gif) I would expect the unit to have much less frequency deviation than 5E-011 with any firmware version above 1.01.. >The steady-state oven current variations are quite small. See >this plot, for example: >http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fury/fury-oven.gif Looks about right for a 1C temp change. >Said, have you measured the ground return loop resistance on >a Fury? We can do the rest of the calculations based on that. Yes, I did all sorts of measurements and tests on our FireFox GPSDO Synthesizer, and Fury GPSDO. One interesting test I did was solder a very thick piece of Copper solder-wick from the OCXO-can directly to the Power supply circuitry main grounding point, in the hopes to have most of the OCXO current flow through this wire, and not the PCB (which current-clamp measurements confirmed to be true!). That did not make any difference in the stability of that particular double-oven OCXO that I could measure. One reason is that the PCB itself was designed to be Kelvin-sensing, and thus most of the ground loop of concern is the short pin going from the OCXO to the PCB, which has very low resistance. Another reason is that Fury can measure the relationship between OCXO current and required EFC voltage to maintain lock, and compensate for that relationship, so some of the induced error is removed by predictive algorithms. So I think it is safe to say that heater-current-induced ground loops are not an issue for Fury or FireFox with the OCXO soldered directly onto the PCB. But when the current is not measured by Fury, and thus not electronically compensated, and the user uses long SMA wires that carry some current, there may be an issue. >Thanks. Here's my math. An average 10 MHz OCXO has an >EFC range of, say, 1e-7 over 10 V. That's 1e-8/V; 1e-11/mV. The MTI OCXO's we use have about +/-20Hz from 0V to 5V, so that's much more than say a 10811A: 8E-07 per volt, or 8E-10/mV (about 2 orders of magnitude more than the 1E-011 you calculated). So let's assume 1/10th of the OCXO current goes through the EFC SMA cable (0.38mA/C). Let's also assume the SMA cable has 0.05 Ohms. This means a 1 Degree C change will cause 0.38mA * 0.05 Ohms * 8E-10/mV = 1.52E-011 change per degree Celsius. There are a lot of assumptions in my calculation, but I think it looks like this is reaching a level of stability that can become a significant error source. bye, Said ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.