If I divide one of the phase corrected outputs to PPS and use it instead of a gps receiver to discipline the input reference crystal oscillator would this system have any advantage over the corrected outputs? I did find a web reference where NASA was using a 2100 receiver to discipline a Austron 2010B reference as part of a triple redundant clock (GPS, Loran-C, and Cesium beam). http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1993/Vol%2025_02.pdf Stanley
----- Original Message ---- From: Dan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Stanley Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:23:35 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100F Stanley Reynolds wrote: > > Yes, would like to know about the phase corrected outputs, any specs, > are they close to the accuracy of the Loran signal it's self ? Nothing claimed in the specs. It just says: "Square wave output, will drive 1 standard TTL load" for both 1 and 10 MHz. Long term, I'm guessing it approaches that of the Loran signal. It looks like the no suffix version is a bit different from the others. Dan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
