Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes:
>   
>> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>> You've misunderstood the problem.
>>     
>
> No, you have, and you are barking up a different tree than I'm climbing.
>
> Look at the subject, it says "... frequency receiver".
>
>   
The meaning diverged/became ambiguous after Magnus made his post.
My comments apply to the extended capability receiver that Magnus 
envisaged and not to a Loran only receiver.
>> If one wishes to decode the AM time code broadcast by JJY WWVB, MSF, MST 
>> etc then the maximum signal averaging time is relatively short.
>>     
>
> I don't so it isn't.
>
>   
But locking to a 1uV signal in the presence of a 1V signal within a 
relatively broad receiver bandpass as Magnus envisaged is unlikely to be 
possible without substantial analog assistance.
> Poul-Henning
>
>   
Actual signal levels for MSF, WWVB etc as well as signal levels would be 
useful in sorting out the limitations of various approaches to combined 
Loran, MSF/WWVB/etc receivers.

Bruce


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to