Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes: > >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > > >> You've misunderstood the problem. >> > > No, you have, and you are barking up a different tree than I'm climbing. > > Look at the subject, it says "... frequency receiver". > > The meaning diverged/became ambiguous after Magnus made his post. My comments apply to the extended capability receiver that Magnus envisaged and not to a Loran only receiver. >> If one wishes to decode the AM time code broadcast by JJY WWVB, MSF, MST >> etc then the maximum signal averaging time is relatively short. >> > > I don't so it isn't. > > But locking to a 1uV signal in the presence of a 1V signal within a relatively broad receiver bandpass as Magnus envisaged is unlikely to be possible without substantial analog assistance. > Poul-Henning > > Actual signal levels for MSF, WWVB etc as well as signal levels would be useful in sorting out the limitations of various approaches to combined Loran, MSF/WWVB/etc receivers.
Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.