At 07:36 AM 8/16/2008, wje wrote: >I have both EE and CS degrees, and I work in both worlds. In my humble >(but completely accurate and stable) opinion, Basic is not a programming >language. It's a tool of Satan designed to convince people that they are >programmers when they really should stick to their janitorial duties. >This is a subset of the general problem that everyone thinks they are >programmers, and usually think their code is perfect. But, that's a rant >for a different audience.
So, how do you tell if you're not a programmer, but pretending to be one? My code is far from perfect, but it can usually be made to get the job done. I try not to cut too many corners, and the ones that I do cut bother me. But when you're the lone programmer on projects, it's hard to know if you're crummy or decent, since there's no one to measure against. (Of course, there's the metric of 'product shipped, product works, bossman happy, paycheck cashed', but that doesn't distinguish between good and bad programmers, just programmers that can fool others along with themselves.) -- newell N5TNL _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
