WB6BNQ wrote:
> Tom Van Baak wrote:
> 
>>> On the DA you will want to ensure all your output cables are of
>>> identical length as this will ensure that all signals are in phase at
>>> the timebase input(s).   It's a small thing really a fraction of a
>>> picosecond but it's there and easily compensated for.
>> When does the phase of the timebase input mean anything?
>> Most test equipment is happy to have a stable external frequency
>> input; the phase is immaterial, no? Can someone give me an
>> example when relative phase among various random pieces of
>> test equipment is important?
>>
>> /tvb
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Your absolutely right.  The only two places that I can think of, off hand, 
> would
> be televison and RADAR (systems with multiple terminals).
> 
> Bill....WB6BNQ

A counterexample would be a sampling system, in which it is required that the 
sample clock be free-running relative to the signal clock. Otherwise all 
samples 
will be at the same few points in the input waveform!

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to