Hello Tom, over the last week we've been doing a test on a double oven Fury GPSDO in response to our discussion. The first part of the test was running the unit on the lab bench without modifications. A couple of days ago, we removed the OCXO Supply regulator feedback sense resistor, and put the sense point right at the VCC pin of the OCXO, therefore Kelvin-sensing the supply voltage behind the current sense resistor, and thus having an extremely well regulated voltage directly on the OCXO, without any VCC current-drop related changes. This was to see if there is any effect on the thermal stability caused by the voltage drop across the Power supply sense resistor, traces, filters, etc. This drop is over 50mV worst case on an un-modified unit. You can see the before and after effects on the plot here: _http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm_ (http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm) You can see the point where we switched the sense resistor as a discontinuity in the EFC voltage. The measured tempco of the unit before and after did not change, it is about 6.0 in both cases (which is a very good number on this particular unit). The unit's performance as measured by GPSCon before and after the modification is also identical, it measures an average of 0.05ns, and 2ns standard deviation. The worst-case deviation is +9ns, and -8ns. Thus on this particular unit there is no measurable effect from the voltage drop between the power supply regulator and the OCXO power supply pin, and in both cases the measured tempco is around 6, which is very good, and means there is very little thermally-induced EFC voltage change required. Keeping in mind that our double oven OCXOs have about 0.12A to 0.15A current range (a 30mA+ delta), and the single oven OCXO's have only about 4mA current change (about 10x less), then we can deduce that the 10x smaller current change in our single-oven OCXO's will have even less VCC/Ground current-loop induced error. bye, Said In a message dated 2/4/2009 17:51:17 Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
> To make this work somewhat smoothly, one would need at least 0.001C or > better 0.0001C resolution. Hi Said, Can you provide some real data, to help me believe this claim? When you get below 1C or 0.1C resolution it starts to matter from which direction the temperature gradient is headed, or from which angle air is flowing. Or which side is up. Or what the humidity is, etc. This, because temperature gradients break any steady state model you have based on a point source (e.g., temp sensor) or average temperature measurement (e.g., oven current). Then there is the matter of the rate at which temperature changes; slow temp changes and rapid temp changes affect an OCXO quite differently. This, due to different thermal time constants of all the metal and insulation materials in and around the OCXO or GPSDO. > To give you an example: a typical single-oven OCXO has about 1ppb per degree > C change. This would mean the unit could only be adjusted by 2.5E-010 steps > with the Dallas Temp sensor as a reference. So the average error would be > 1.25E-010, which results in a massive 12.5 microseconds average drift error in > 1000s intervals due to the temperature quantization error! Are you assuming a design where one takes a Dallas reading each second and stuffs it into the EFC every second? No one would actually do that. Instead if one averages the temperature sensor over 10, 100 or more seconds you avoid large EFC steps. Everything else in a GPSDO is all about slow averaging; there's no reason temperature adaptation cannot be treated the same. I suppose I should add a random temperature cycle hold-over test to the abuse I inflict on each GPSDO here. Are you saying the Fury would do much better than others in this regard? Again, given this is time-nuts, some real data would be nice. /tvb _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
