Hi Mark, 2009/4/13 Mark Sims <hol...@hotmail.com>: > > Hello Steve, > > Try this... take Tom's sample data set, run the numbers. Then, using a > good random number generator, make another data set by randomly throwing out > half (or more) of the samples (to simulate a non ZDT counter). Run the > numbers again. See how they change. This should give you a good idea of how > using a standard counter would affect your adev numbers.
But randomly throwing out data points would introduce ZDT. The whole point I was making was that the data set is well defined the "missing" data occurs every other sample therefore tau0 = 2 x (sample period of each sample). 73, Steve > > ---------------------------------------- > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. > http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage1_042009 > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD & JAKDTTNW Omnium finis imminet _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
