Hi Mark,

2009/4/13 Mark Sims <hol...@hotmail.com>:
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> Try this...  take Tom's sample data set,  run the numbers.  Then,  using a 
> good random number generator,  make another data set by randomly throwing out 
> half (or more) of the samples (to simulate a non ZDT counter).  Run the 
> numbers again.  See how they change.  This should give you a good idea of how 
> using a standard counter would affect your adev numbers.

But randomly throwing out data points would introduce ZDT. The whole
point I was making was that the data set is well defined the "missing"
data occurs every other sample therefore tau0 = 2 x (sample period of
each sample).

73,
Steve

>
> ----------------------------------------
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you.
> http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage1_042009
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD & JAKDTTNW
Omnium finis imminet

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to