Hi Jerry,
You're probably right. Since they haven't given us any info it's
dangerous to make assumptions.
Ed
gsteinb...@aol.com wrote:
Can you really interpolate this information? Perhaps probable, but there is no
guarantee that the tempco for this oscillator is going to be nicely linear.
Jerry
Hi Ed,
I agree with you now that I have looked at it and only assumed that it
was a typo by Racal, IE. missing out the per deg C but it could be
interpreted as you say and that would give it superior temp stability
as compared with the 04B.
Cheers,
Steve
2009/8/28 Ed Palmer <ed_pal...@sasktel.net>:
Hi Steve,
I don't know if this is a typo, but one of the copies of the 1991/1992
manual lists the 04E temperature performance as "<= 7 x 10e-9 over the range
of 0C to 50C". ?i.e. not per degree C. ?That would be the same as "<=1.4 e
-10 per degree C".
Could that explain the apparent contradiction of superior construction and
inferior temperature performance? ?By the way, do you have any details on
the superior construction?
Ed
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
